Quote: "Why are so many people having so much trouble accepting the Cochlear Implant as a tool in approaches to Deafness?"
[FYI: The "d" in the word "deafness" is not capitalized because "deafness" is a pathological term, and therefore only addresses one narrow part of being human, instead of taking into account the whole human being. The word "Deaf" with an upper-case "D" refers to the whole person and makes the analogy between Deaf people and people of other cultural groups such as African-Americans, Latinos, Italian-Americans, Ukrainians, etc.]
My response: In the late 1950s, there were some Deaf people were concerned about how hearing aids might be used improperly and what influence this would have on the Deaf community, and they had valid points. Of course they knew that this had ramifications for the future. They were not so naive to think that the doctors and scientists would stop pushing hearing aid use with Deaf children. That was part of the beginning of what has become a destructive trend toward Deaf human beings.
Nowadays, many Deaf and hearing people are appalled to see that parents would allow doctors and scientists to drill a hole into Deaf babies' skulls and force them to take drugs in the process, knowing that Deaf babies have no way to communicate if they don't feel well or are in pain. I begin to wonder much further the scientists and doctors will keep going along these lines once they realize that cochlear implant technology is not sufficient for Deaf babies, just like hearing aids have not been sufficient. They will probably keep persisting and persisting, because they will continue to ignorantly view Deaf babies as just being hearing babies who can't hear. Yet using the tools such as CIs, which involve cutting up a baby's head, is a risk that is too high to take, especially since there is nothing wrong with allowing the baby to be Deaf. There is something wrong this picture if doctors cannot see this. Any person who has normal intelligence should be able to recognize that there is something seriously wrong when doctors are drilling babies' heads for the sake of society's convenience. What's more, scientists and doctors would go too far in pushing for Deaf embryos to be discarded, because they can't find a way to "cure" Deaf people.
Quote: "If this is the case, I can understand why there is so much resentment, anger and closed-mindedness when a hearing person tries to convey a message with heart, not dictate"
My response: People who don't have a deep understanding about Deaf history and Deaf culture tend to have the bad habit of directing blame toward the Deaf community and attempting to label Deaf people as being angry, resentful, and closed-minded. Members of the Deaf community work very hard to work with the majority to have Deaf people's right to exist as Deaf beings recognized. Detractors see the Deaf community as being helpless people who need to be rescued. The detractors want Deaf people to undergo therapy. They would try to place a conceptual "hook" onto Deaf people because they (the detractors) want to convey the image of Deaf people being seen as frail, weak, and not confident, because they want to be seen as having a "heart" to help the Deaf. This is a big turn off. Deaf people are fully capable of engaging themselves with others in healthy, proactive ways, and we do. There is no reason to label Deaf people as being angry, resentful or closed-minded.
Quote: "However, when you refuse to let yourself trust people, you miss out on a helluva lot of incredible people and the opportunity to enrich your life."
My response: TRUST is something that EVERYONE must be mindful of in this world. Trust is something to be developed and earned. The detractors need to change to become open-minded enough to be able to learn and not think they can just jump in as if they are our heroes.. There are many wonderful, outspoken people in the Deaf community, and we don't need people treating us like we are victims or helpless people. If they want to work with the Deaf community, then please, they should feel free to jump in. But if they want to help us so they can make themselves out to be heroes, then they should please back off and examine their ideas and their motives as to why they have the urge to be heroes. For example they may have unsolved issues in their childhoods that give them the urge to jump in and try to be heroic every time a similar situation comes up. We have many wonderful heroes inside and outside that do not "help" or "rescue" the Deaf community, but instead work with us as equals. The detractors need to stop perpetuating stereotypes and prejudging us.
Quote: "But you have experiences as a mother and Aidan doesn't and that is where the discussion ends for me..."
My response: Giving birth to a child does not automatically mean that someone is competent to raise children, and people who have not given birth to children are also qualified to raise and care for children. People who have not given birth to a child can and do contribute a great deal to Deaf children's upbringing. It is not about measuring who is mother enough and who is not mother enough. People who have this kind of attitude who make negative comments are looking for a way to shut up the people who are passionate about children's futures.
Quote: "Aidan …I will not debate with someone who has the need to nitpick every other word, then back it up with references. That doesn't accomplish anything toward understanding."
My response: Those who point fingers are directing attention away from themselves and what they're doing by accusing someone else of doing this to them just to get them upset. They make themselves seem like people who never would dream of doing such a thing themselves, all the while they are doing exactly that. It's all based on political correctness when it comes to debating or to disagreement. Everyone has become accustomed to saying things differently in order to soften the blow or to avoid facing someone else's reaction.
We live in a society of blame shifters. You see in blame shifters a flight from reality when they demand that you see the situation from their perspective, of which only they are right. It is impossible to deal with people who use this strategy in conversation. In short, you cannot reason with a blame shifter. A blame shifter is someone who always tries to turn "no's" into "yeses" (or vice versa) in order to ultimately always get his or her way.


22 comments:
that awesome points! brsvo!
It's popular among evolutionism's way of thinking that deaf are imperfect and it has to be fixed.
Aidan,
You hit the nail on the head!
Some people flatly refuse to
-©^©¬ the truth. Alas!
Ms. Mack is correct on all rebuttals to the unnamed "quote."
So many hearies are audists-- people who assume they know what's best for deafies--determined to "help" us despite ourselves.
The oralist-only way isn't the best for me, nor for my deaf sister.
It's only one tool of others to be used to the degree of comfort by the deaf individual.
When you tap an infant's head and forbid visual language, you limit the individual's access.
I'm one of the many cochler implant failures. Thank God (but not the audists) that I had early fluency in sign lanuage to keep in communications.
Aidan,
Thank you for your response and for taking the time to explain certain things.
Funny, but I've been hearing the expression "drilling or cutting a child's head open" so many times that I'm becoming desensitized despite having put my son through the same experience.
I perceive a lot of generalizing and preaching in this post as opposed to the usual intensity...you're crusading here, Aidan - for "your" Deaf people. There are many different Deaf people (btw, thanks for the big D, little d explanation, I didn't know that)including my son. You don't need to feel sorry for him.
I am a teacher, I have taken care of kids and even saved a few in that role. There are many differences between teachers and moms, and I will say that sometimes, the teachers are the better mothers...I will give you this.
However, a truly good teacher and mother recognizes that EACH and EVERY SINGLE (emphasizing) child is different and that there is no one solution for each child. Thank you, Jodi
I got to admit that I'm too chicken to speak up what we concern, but I want to applause for your bravery to stand up and speak clearly. They're human and have a right to express what we concern about. The hearing people try to push down in Deafies' throat or think they are in a cult or something like that. It's not true. It is Hearing's weapon to shut us out.
Jodi,
If each and every child is different, as you say, then why are deaf babies being implanted as tiny babies, BEFORE they have a chance to grow and show their differences?
How can anyone know whether or not a cochlear implant will be a good solution for a baby who has not yet grown and developed?
Aidan,
I always wonder about something. You're a filmmaker, right? How are you able to edit the films, in particular the scenes with dialogues between the actors since you can't hear what they're saying? What about adding sound effects and music to the film? How do you direct the film since you can't hear what the actors are saying? As someone who studied filmmaking for five years, I've found that there's a lot of hearing involved in the film, and my film teacher, and even professors from UCLA (I took a class at UCLA one summer), always told their students that sound is one of the most crucial elements of filmmaking. At my university where filmmaking major is offered, one of the courses that they have to take is "Sound Design." Did your school require you take some kind of sound design course, and if they did, were you exempted from it since you can't hear the sounds or if you weren't, how did you handle it? That's one of the gifts that my CI has given me which is the ability to edit the sounds, add music, and add sound effects in the film. I'm sure you're a great in cinematography, visual effects and/ or any kind of visual stuff that you do with filmmaking, but I always wonder how you handle the sound and hearing part of the filmmaking.
For so many years this battle has been fought. Now, with the research into genetic manipulation and your comments on how "it is never enough", I find myself discouraged about this situation. Kudos to you Aidan for your strength, resiliency and diplomacy in expressing these views.
Thanks for providing logic toward those who think in illogical ways. With the current dilemma in UK for genetic screening, I call it "forced natural selection." It goes against what should be a natural process into an artificial process, same idea applies with C.I.
Hi Aidan,
I love that you say "drilling babies' heads for the sake of society's convenience. What's more, scientists and doctors would go too far in pushing for Deaf embryos to be discarded, because they can't find a way to "cure" Deaf people."
Damned right you're!
Amen!
Hey Adrian
You made a good point! I agree with Jean's comment.
I don't understand why some people are afraid to speak up (sign up) about C.I. Maybe you may know why so please tell me.
Hands waving!
Joseph
Aidan, good vlog. Yeah, some Deaf people tend to forgot that they also have their own problem. We need not focus on negative other. We need to focus on Deaf culture, Deafhood and Deaf community that what we can do for them. Not what we can do against other. It is God's sovereignty that He allowed it happened because it would make Deaf community stronger in unity, culture, language, etc. Otherwise, Deaf community would be weak.
We need to avoid be a blame shifter. But focus how Deaf community can grow strong and positive ways. Glad that you brought up this issue.
Hi Rachel,
Thank you for commenting on my post. What you said in the comment is perfect evidence of your ignorance and lack of knowledge of sound departments in the film industry. My next post will have all kinds of evidence about sound departments in the film industry. :o)
Aidan
Hi Anonymous,
You raise a very good point that I can't answer, because I did not implant my son as a baby, he was eight years old. I am not here to say that the ci is the only way to go, I am only here to share what our experience has been positive and negative.
I can hypothesize that parents want to provide more opportunities for their child's future life in mainstream society, but I don't think that will be a satisfying enough answer. I don't have the answers for every other baby, child, adult, etc. I only know the choices I made and my reasons for making them. I know this doesn't help, but this is the best answer I can give...Jodi
Aidan,
I loved the way you said especially when people try to use "mirrors" to talk back and pointing the blame back to the deaf person. I've faced these situations many times, it is incredibly frustrating because it is always the deaf person's fault, blah blah..... It is very hurtful at times.
I see that Rachel wasn't reading into what you were trying to say and focused on your filmmaking. There are lot of people out there who really don't understand what we are saying.
I have never felt so frustrated in my life when I go in Cochlear Implant Online and share my experience, I try to be friendly and direct but instead I get attacked and no one seems to listen at all. There are "Ms/Mr Know It All" people there with such enoromous attitudes that you cannot even rationalize with them and come to an agreement.
Whoa! Rachel stung you 3 times with 3 questions "how since you can't hear?" She tried to make you feel inferior. Tell her that there're more Deaf filmmakers without CI.
Hey Aidan,
You are Amazon!!!! Big Hand Wave!!! I love to see you to create every new silver bullet. You would not be alone. Our Deaf communities would stand beside you.
Hi Aidan,
I think Rachel's questions are very rude and are intimidating you. Her attitude and behaviour in her comment are unacceptable.
Deafchip
That person is talking foolish. Aidan's music video with "ASL Music (B.A.D.) Tribute to David" was nominated as best single clip for DeafRead Awards. Both are Deaf.
Aidan, you're always right on the money. I really wish you get paid for all of your work that you put out on your Vlogs. And you providing transcripts makes you accessible.
I was pondering the past week why people are boiling about the CI issue - why there's continued discord. Drolz got me into it with his recent beautiful piece of writing about his family's decision on the issue. Then I got to thinking when I was in high school, I remembered asking my mom what she thought of CI. She said, "oh, no! never! that stuff is dangerous." That was the late 80's.
People are more accepting of surgeries. When a plastic surgeon lifts a face, there's a 50-50 miracle. Maybe they won't like the face. The same with CI- not every CI implantee gets the cup half full.
Once again you are my Deafhood HERO. Thank you for this and all your other "speak up" vlogs. You inspire me. My opinion about Rachel's so-called challenge is that you should not waste your energy defending yourself or other Deaf filmmakers, but challenge her on what ART is ... a REFLECTION of a culture.... and what its POTENTIAL of creative, fresh perspectives on our ONE world with its diverstiy.
Post a Comment